A good night was had by all and the boys received plenty of attention from friends, strangers and the usual throng of confused and excited straight men. There was even someone there from the social pages of the local press who flattered the 'ladies' by snapping a few poses and taking their details. So, it wasn't too much of a surprise when Fluffy and the bunny girl made an appearance in both the Centralian Advocate and Sunday Territorian in the following weeks.
Centralian Advocate: August 21, 1987 © News Ltd: used with permission. |
Sunday Territorian: September 6, 1987 © News Ltd: used with permission. |
What was surprising was a fairly angry letter from one Connie MacMahon. Although she gave her address as Adelaide we always had a strong suspicion that it was actually someone local who knew us.
September 4, 1987
DRAG IS A DRAG
| Sir,
As a visitor to Alice
Springs, I am writing to register my displeasure at the sight of one Mr
Paul Smith dressed as a Playboy bunny in a photograph taken at the recent
Bindi Ball.
|
© News Ltd: used with permission. |
Connie McMahon, Adelaide.
EDITOR'S NOTE: People lacking a sense of fun can also be a drag.
Having traded on their fame for a few weeks there was no way the boys wanted to have their fun finish on a sour note. So, I dashed off a typically verbose letter to the editor of the local paper. That ensured the issue stayed a topic of polite converstation about the town for a few weeks more. And it certainly let the townsfolk know we were there and not afraid to answer back.
September 18, 1987
WILD ASSERTIONS
Sir,
A few observations
in response to the letter of Connie McMahon (Advocate 4-9-87) titled Drag
is a drag.'
It strikes me as somewhat
amazing that in such a typical Alice Springs week - bare bums and urinating
in the Todd Tavern, simulated sex by a nude couple in the Stuart Arms,
more topless waitresses needed at Wests Sporting Club, five publicly advertised
escort agencies and a strip-agram service that Mr Paul Smith and his bunny
ears should be singled out as the international sex offender and degrader
of women extrordinaire that Ms McMahon would have us believe.
Frankly, I just don't
think its true. Paul's a nice boy.
© News Ltd: used with permission. |
The pro/ anti pornography
debate is one normally conducted in a fairly heated fashion with some pretty
wild assertions being fired from both sides.
The two major opposing arguments appear to be that pornography either incites or dissipates sexual aggression (stereotypically male). As far as I am aware neither side in the debate has been able to irrefutably prove its case although both assert it as fact. If pornography is indeed a problem, and specifically bunny girls, then surely Ms McMahon's prime objective should be to dissuade women from participating in the perpetuation of the activity. |
Men in bunny drag in
Alice Springs would seem a fairly low priority and their contribution to
the oppression of women globally, infinitesimal, if at all real.
The implication that
Mr Smith's activities are calculated to "send up" the bunny girl stereotype
reflects, I think, a further error of judgement on Ms McMahon's part.
Certainly, satire
is one potential function of the time-honored tradition of cross-sex dressing.
Drag is a complex
phenomenon adopted for a wide variety of reasons - a major one is the entertainment
value of its successful performance; another is the shock of illusion.
The shock of illusion
is a powerful device. And I think that Ms McMahon may well miss its potential
for education in her rush to condemn.
The consequence of
encountering a walking, stereotypical image of western women which is instantly
revealed as an illusion by the depth of vocal range is not the reinforcement
of the stereotype as Ms McMahon suggests.
Rather the effect
is to instantly divorce the stereotype from reality, highlighting the distinction
between a women and the image of a woman.
Politically effective
drag confronts society with the error of its generalisations and Mr Smith
achieves that on a regular basis.
He not only turns
heads but forces them to think and entertain a wide range of what often
are, for them disquieting possibilities.
Drag is many things.
It is only a drag to those unable to appreciate its subtleties.
John R. Hobson, Alice Springs.